---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

In the two-way trading of foreign exchange investment, the Hong Kong foreign exchange market was once highly dependent on mainland foreign exchange investors. However, with the maturation of the regulatory system and the internationalization of the market, the activity of the Hong Kong foreign exchange market has gradually declined.

---

This "quiet" phenomenon can be attributed to three aspects: increasingly stringent regulatory policies in Hong Kong, increasingly sophisticated and astute investors, and the continuous increase in the number of overseas trading platforms. From the perspective of regulators, this helps reduce risk; for investors, they have more choices. However, for local foreign exchange brokers, profit margins have been significantly compressed, and survival faces challenges.
In principle, Hong Kong's local foreign exchange margin business is not open to mainland Chinese residents. This involves the intersection of mainland China's foreign exchange management regulations, Hong Kong's financial regulatory system, and cross-border service regulation. Licensed companies wishing to market, solicit, or provide foreign exchange margin services to residents outside Hong Kong (including mainland China) must comply with the regulatory requirements of the jurisdiction where the other party's jurisdiction is located. In mainland China, retail individual participation in forex margin trading is strictly prohibited. Therefore, Hong Kong forex margin brokers cannot actively attract mainland clients, as cross-border marketing is explicitly forbidden by law. Even with a Hong Kong license, they cannot proactively promote, open accounts, or advertise to mainland residents. This makes Hong Kong brokers neither willing nor able to actively accept mainland clients, while mainland investors face numerous difficulties in remitting funds to the Hong Kong forex market.
In the past, many Hong Kong forex margin brokers' main source of revenue was mainland clients. However, since 2016, mainland China has strengthened its control over cross-border forex trading, and Hong Kong brokers have been required to cut off non-compliant channels. This has led to a significant reduction in their main client base, while retail investors have gradually shifted to crypto assets or overseas platforms. Client attrition, leverage restrictions, and rising regulatory costs have further reduced the activity of the local Hong Kong forex margin business, making the market increasingly sluggish.

In two-way trading in forex investment, a trader's moment of epiphany often becomes a key turning point in their trading career.

---

For short-term traders, this epiphany usually occurs when they realize that there aren't quality short-term entry opportunities every day. This realization breaks their blind pursuit of frequent trading, prompting them to be more cautious in choosing trading opportunities.
Furthermore, this realization becomes even more profound when short-term traders discover that the actual utility of chart indicator windows and most forex trading indicators is extremely limited. In fact, apart from candlestick charts, other indicators often fail to provide substantial help. This discovery leads them to abandon their reliance on complex indicators and instead focus on simpler, more effective tools.
Once short-term traders grasp these key points, they can avoid unnecessary losses. And when they further confirm these views, they can basically achieve stable profits. This shift not only improved their trading efficiency but also boosted their confidence in the market.
For long-term investors, the moment of epiphany is different. They typically realize that only by adopting a low-position, long-term strategy, repeatedly placing low-position positions and holding them for several years, combined with a long-term carry trade strategy, can they achieve a high probability of profit with virtually no risk of loss. The core of this strategy lies in reducing risk through the accumulation of time and sound position management, while simultaneously obtaining substantial returns.
Furthermore, long-term investors gradually discover the limitations of chart indicator windows and most forex trading indicators, realizing that apart from moving averages, other indicators have negligible impact. This understanding makes them focus more on the long-term trend of the market, rather than short-term fluctuations.
When long-term investors grasp these key strategies, they can effectively avoid losses. And when they further confirm these views, they can essentially achieve stable profits. This epiphany not only changes their perception of trading tools but also reshapes their trading strategies and mindset, enabling them to maintain robust trading performance in complex market environments.

In the two-way trading market of forex investment, moving averages, as a classic technical analysis tool, are highly correlated with the trader's choice of trading timeframe. Long-term traders and short-term traders have drastically different attitudes and usages towards moving averages.

---

The core difference stems from the divergent impact of the inherent "lagging" nature of moving averages across different timeframes: For long-term traders, the lag of moving averages is not a flaw, but rather an advantage that filters out false trends and enhances the safety of position building; while for short-term traders, this lag directly affects the timeliness of entry and exit, ultimately leading them to prefer other technical tools.
Long-term forex traders do not care about the lag of moving averages; instead, they actively utilize this characteristic to optimize their trading decisions.
The core logic of long-term trading is to capture long-term market trends (typically with holding periods calculated over months or even years), rather than pursuing profits from short-term fluctuations. Therefore, it requires less precision in "entry timing" but extremely high accuracy in "trend judgment." The lagging nature of moving averages essentially involves summarizing and smoothing past price movements; their signals often lag behind real-time price changes. This "late entry" characteristic helps long-term traders filter out short-term false trends in the market (such as brief pullbacks caused by sudden news or false breakouts without financial support). When a moving average issues a trend confirmation signal, the market trend has already demonstrated a certain degree of continuity and stability. Entering at this point effectively reduces the risk of establishing a position due to trend reversal, essentially setting up a "trend screening barrier" for long-term holdings. This is the core reason why long-term traders are willing to accept and even rely on the lagging nature of moving averages.
From a practical perspective, the core purpose of long-term forex traders using moving averages is focused on "entry and adding to positions," not "exit." In long-term trading strategies, moving averages are primarily used to determine trend direction and trigger entry signals. When prices exhibit a stable upward or downward trend along a long-term moving average, traders use the moving average as a reference, gradually entering positions when prices retrace to the moving average without breaking the trend. As the trend continues, if prices remain above (or below) the moving average (corresponding to short positions), and the moving average direction does not reverse, traders will continue to add to their positions in batches based on moving average signals, building a position structure consistent with the long-term trend through "multiple entry points and gradual accumulation." In this operational model, the holding period often lasts for several years, and exit decisions rely more on signals of a fundamental trend reversal (such as a moving average reversal or a price break below a key support level) rather than short-term fluctuations of the moving average itself. Therefore, the function of moving averages in long-term trading is highly concentrated on "trend confirmation and entry guidance," with a weaker correlation to exit decisions.
In stark contrast to long-term traders, short-term forex traders are extremely sensitive to the lagging nature of moving averages. Whether for entry or exit, the lag in moving average signals makes it difficult to meet the timeliness requirements of short-term trading. The core logic of short-term trading is to capture short-term market fluctuations (holding periods are typically measured in minutes or hours), aiming to complete position opening and closing within a very short time. Therefore, the requirement for "timeliness" is extremely high—entry must accurately capture the starting point of a short-term trend, and exit must promptly lock in profits or stop losses. Any signal delay can lead to compressed profit potential or expanded losses. However, the lag in moving averages prevents them from reflecting short-term price changes in real time: when a moving average issues an entry signal, the short-term trend may have already entered its middle or later stages, and profit potential has been compressed; when a moving average issues an exit signal, the price may have already experienced a significant pullback, leading to expanded stop-losses or profit retracement. This contradiction between "signal lag" and "timeliness requirements" significantly reduces the practicality of moving averages in short-term trading.
This is why experienced short-term forex traders tend to use candlestick charts rather than moving averages as their core analytical tool. Candlestick charts visually reflect the opening, closing, highest, and lowest prices within a given timeframe. Through combinations of different candlestick patterns (such as hammers, engulfing patterns, and morning stars), they convey real-time changes in market power, helping short-term traders quickly identify reversals or continuations of short-term trends. This "real-time" and "detailed" nature perfectly matches the precision timing requirements of short-term trading. In contrast, moving averages smooth out short-term price fluctuations, masking crucial short-term price details. This prevents short-term traders from promptly capturing key moments in the battle between bulls and bears. Therefore, in mature short-term trading strategies, moving averages are often excluded from core tools or used only as supplementary references, rather than the sole basis for decision-making.
Essentially, the different applications of moving averages by long-term and short-term traders are essentially choices of matching "trading cycle goals" with "tool characteristics": long-term trading pursues trend stability, which aligns with the lagging nature of moving averages; short-term trading prioritizes timing, which conflicts with the lagging nature of moving averages. This difference is not a matter of the superiority or inferiority of the tools themselves, but rather a trader's rational selection of tools based on their own trading logic and risk appetite, ultimately forming the typical application pattern in the forex market: "long-term traders use moving averages, short-term traders abandon them."

In two-way forex trading, there is no direct correlation between a forex trader's qualifications and investment returns. Profits and losses in forex trading do not solely depend on certifications.

---

While knowledge is crucial in the investment field, the complexity of the market environment leads to significant differences between theory and practice. Those unfamiliar with the forex market should avoid blind investment, as theoretical learning and exams do not guarantee against losses in real trading. Losses in real trading are often closely related to a lack of practical experience. There is no necessary connection between the two.
For forex traders, obtaining certification only proves a certain level of professional and theoretical knowledge. In professional fields, obtaining certification is not difficult, especially after studying relevant professional knowledge, which often leads to a deep understanding. The existence of a certificate primarily indicates that an individual is qualified to perform related work, but job performance is not directly related to the certificate itself. In the forex investment field, holding a CFA certificate may broaden a trader's horizons and raise their future career ceiling, but this does not guarantee trading success. In fact, the proportion of successful traders is usually much higher than those who have not systematically studied and have figured things out on their own. However, whether or not one holds a certificate is not the decisive factor. Only through accumulating practical experience, continuously refining trading systems, and carefully summarizing lessons learned can the probability of success be truly increased. After all, success ultimately depends on individual effort and practice.
In the field of forex investment, holding a certification does not necessarily guarantee investment success. Just as having a driver's license doesn't guarantee you can drive well, or being a certified psychologist doesn't guarantee you'll be competent in the profession. Many psychologists may even struggle because they can't manage their own problems. Similarly, highly educated undergraduates, master's students, and doctoral students don't necessarily possess profound knowledge. In trading, the greatest enemy is often oneself, and the greatest risk a trader faces also comes from within. It's extremely difficult for a person to objectively and rationally understand themselves, which is the most direct and fundamental reason for trading failure. This is because traders often cannot properly handle their internal conflicts, and trading is essentially a psychological war—a brutal field. Even with a CFA charter, traders can suffer huge losses, even worse than the average person. It is estimated that 80% to 90% of traders in the trading world lose money, but few are willing to admit their losses, and even fewer can honestly face themselves. Self-deception is rampant.

In the two-way trading market of forex investment, an easily overlooked reality is that even if traders hold various financial qualifications, including the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation, it is difficult to achieve financial freedom, and even the effect on improving trading success rates is very limited. This phenomenon is not accidental, but is determined by the positioning of financial qualifications, the practical nature of forex trading, and the objective laws governing market operation.

---

Take the CFA charter as an example. As a highly recognized professional qualification in the global financial field, it was established in 1963 by the Association for Investment Management and Research (AIMR). Holding the professional exam twice a year, it ranks among the world's largest. Its comprehensive theoretical knowledge system covering securities investment and asset management makes it a "stepping stone" for job seekers in the financial industry—possessing a CFA charter often means greater favor from financial institutions during the resume screening stage and adds weight to one's career development. This is similar to the function of a university diploma or teacher's qualification certificate; essentially, it uses a standardized assessment system to demonstrate to the market that the holder possesses basic theoretical knowledge and learning ability in a specific field, rather than directly proving core practical profit-making abilities.
However, the core competitiveness of forex trading lies not in the degree of mastery of theoretical knowledge, but in risk control, market judgment, execution of trading discipline, and the ability to cope with market uncertainty in practice. Even if a trader possesses a CFA charter and has mastered a systematic financial theory, they cannot directly translate this knowledge into a consistently profitable trading strategy. Just like many forex trading analysts who can base their strategies on market data and fundamental factors, They can analyze future market trends with clear logic and even offer seemingly reasonable trading suggestions, but when they actually trade, they often fail to cope with real-time market fluctuations, struggle to overcome human greed and fear, or fail to accurately control stop-loss and take-profit points, ultimately leading to trading losses. This gap of "talking the talk but not walking the walk" is the essential difference between theoretical knowledge and practical ability—certifications like the CFA assess learning ability, knowledge reserves, and exam skills, while forex trading tests practical experience, mindset management, and decision-making execution; the evaluation systems are completely different.
From a broader market perspective, there is no necessary positive correlation between high education, high qualifications, and high profitability. Even graduating from top global finance schools with a solid professional foundation, most people are unlikely to become billionaires; big data directly shows that those with higher education tend to excel in work skills and professional ethics, making them more suitable as senior employees in companies rather than top traders in the market. This is because academic qualifications and certifications demonstrate "compliance" and "professionalism," helping individuals better adapt to existing workplace rules. Forex trading, however, requires "breakthrough" and "uniqueness," demanding that traders find their own profit-making logic in a complex and ever-changing market. This ability cannot be mass-produced through standardized education or assessment systems.
Specifically, for CFA charterholders, passing all three levels of the exam certainly demonstrates good memory, English proficiency, perseverance, and a grasp of basic financial knowledge. However, to date, there is no data or case study to prove a direct correlation between these qualities and forex trading ability. Strong exam performance does not guarantee accurate market trend judgment; familiarity with financial theory does not guarantee rationality in the face of losses. The only way to prove one's trading ability is through real-world market experience and consistent, stable profits. Unfortunately, many CFA charterholders tend to choose lower-risk, more stable career paths, such as working in financial institutions or using their certification to start a training business (just as a teacher's certificate makes it easier to become a teacher), rather than venturing into the high-risk forex market.
More importantly, traders who truly achieve stable profits in the forex market rarely focus on obtaining certifications. For them, real-world market profits are the most powerful proof of their qualifications, not something they need to endorse with a CFA or similar certification. Those who spend a lot of time obtaining certifications are doing so more to enhance their competitiveness in the workplace or to gain industry recognition, rather than to improve their trading skills. From this perspective, CFA and similar certifications are more like "entry tickets" to the financial industry than "profit keys" to forex trading. Attempting to achieve financial freedom in forex trading through certifications essentially confuses the concepts of "workplace competitiveness" and "market profitability," ultimately leading to the predicament of being qualified but unable to profit.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---